The same algorithm, pointed at the hardest asset to hold with a clear head

Our first ETF study took on QQQ and the index-fund playbook on the friendliest terrain passive investing has. This study points the same algorithm at a very different kind of asset.

Gold is the oldest store of value in the world, and the hardest one to hold with a clear head. It pays no dividend and produces no earnings, so there is no valuation anchor to steady your judgment. It spends years asleep, then reprices violently in months. Every investor who has owned it knows both feelings: the fear of buying too late, and the regret of never selling.

As we write this in July 2026, gold sits roughly 28% below the all-time high it set in late January. Both feelings are fresh.

We did not build a new model. We took the exact Market Wave algorithm our clients already run and pointed it at GLD. The benchmark in every test is a monthly dollar-cost-averaging investor: the same capital, split into equal monthly buys, never selling, ignoring price.

The record bull run

Weekly · 2024 to 2026

Strategy

+55.5%

DCA
+22.5%

The mid-trend entry

Daily · 2025 to 2026

Strategy

+20.7%

DCA
+2.7%

The worst case

Weekly · 2011 to 2024

Strategy, 100% cash

+50.4%

DCA
+40.3%

All three runs started from the same hypothetical $100,000 in cash and zero shares.

Backtested performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.

The subject

The metal that tests every investor

GLD is the largest physically backed gold ETF in the world. When you buy it, you buy gold's entire emotional weather system: inflation fear, currency politics, war premiums, and the oldest safe-haven instinct in finance.

Gold's price, at the levels that matter:

  1. Sep 2011$1,920 peak
  2. Dec 2015$1,050 low
  3. Aug 2020$2,075
  4. Mar 2024$2,180
  5. Jan 2026$5,589 all-time high
  6. Jul 2026About $4,060, down 28%

GLD shares

GLD shares
DateAug 20112015 lowJun 2024Jan 2026Jul 2026
GLD share price~$158~$100$211.60~$500$370.80
Scenario windowScenario 3 opensScenario 1 opensScenarios 1 and 2 end

Scenario 3, worst case: weekly, Aug 2011 to Mar 2024. Scenario 1, record bull run: weekly, Jun 2024 to Jul 2026. Scenario 2, mid-trend entry: daily, Apr 2025 to Jul 2026. Price levels per public market data and World Gold Council figures. For educational purposes only. Not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

Gold rewards patience enormously, but only across cycles that outlast most investors' patience, and it punishes bad entry timing for years at a stretch. It is precisely the kind of asset where emotion does the most damage, in both directions.

Market Wave Algorithm for ETFs

What Market Wave actually does

Arch Public's trend and momentum capture algorithm, the same algorithm already running for our crypto and equities clients, applied to GLD unchanged. It does three things with rules instead of emotions.

Ride confirmed directional moves

It enters on rule-based confirmation of a trend, not on a headline, a fear spike, or a fixed calendar date.

Exit on rules, not nerves

It takes profits into strength on defined triggers, banking gains into cash rather than holding every position on principle.

Step aside cleanly when the trend is not there

In chop, indecision, and multi-year declines it is willing to hold cash and wait, exactly where a calendar-driven buyer keeps buying anyway.

The only variables in this study are the time window and the chart interval. Same algorithm, same starting $100,000.

Backtested results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.

Three windows, one pattern

Every test measured against the same disciplined monthly DCA benchmark. In every window the algorithm finished ahead, and finished with meaningful realized cash, which DCA by definition never produces.

GLD results by scenario
ScenarioThe record bull runThe mid-trend entryThe worst case
Chart, windowWeekly · 2024 to 2026Daily · 2025 to 2026Weekly · 2011 to 2024
Ending value$155,517$120,700$150,398
Strategy ROI+55.5%+20.7%+50.4%
DCA ROI+22.5%+2.7%+40.3%
Vs DCA+33.1+18.0+10.1
Realized profit, banked as cash$43,105$33,377$50,398
DCA realized profit$0$0$0

Every window started from the same $100,000 in cash and zero shares. Realized profit is completed-trade profit per window. This is what DCA can never produce.

Across a euphoric run, a late entry into a top, and a thirteen-year worst case, the algorithm banked between $33,377 and $50,398 in completed-trade cash per window. The dollar-cost averager, across all three combined, realized nothing. On an asset with no dividend and no earnings, that is the whole difference between owning gold's story and getting paid by it.

Backtested results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. For educational purposes only.

The calendar is not a strategy

  1. 01

    The DCA prescription gets the diagnosis right

    Emotion is the number one destroyer of gold returns: panic buying at fever tops, capitulating at bottoms, freezing when the trend leaves. DCA cures the emotion and beat doing nothing in all three windows. The diagnosis deserves real respect.

  2. 02

    But the cure amputates the payout

    To guarantee it never panics, DCA agreed to never look and never sell. On an asset whose entire return is price, never selling means never collecting. Across all three windows, disciplined DCA realized a combined $0. Real gains, but all story, no settlement.

  3. 03

    Discipline and awareness are not opposites

    The same rules that remove emotion can watch price structure, take profits into strength, step aside in declines, and re-enter on confirmation. That combination beat the calendar in every window, and it is the only approach that ever put realized cash in the account.

Gold will keep doing what it has done for fifteen years: long sleeps, violent repricings, euphoric tops, punishing corrections. You do not have to predict any of it. You have to be systematically present for it, and systematically willing to get paid.

For educational purposes only. Trading ETFs involves significant risk.